European University Institute Library

Mapping policy preferences from texts, edited by Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, Michael D. McDonald, Hans-Dieter Klingemann [with nine others], III

Label
Mapping policy preferences from texts, edited by Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, Michael D. McDonald, Hans-Dieter Klingemann [with nine others], III
Language
eng
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Illustrations
illustrations
Index
index present
Literary Form
non fiction
Main title
Mapping policy preferences from texts
Nature of contents
bibliography
Oclc number
866836541
Responsibility statement
edited by Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, Michael D. McDonald, Hans-Dieter Klingemann [with nine others]
Summary
The Manifesto data are the only comprehensive set of policy indicators for social, economic and political research. It is thus vital that their quality is established. The purpose of this book is to review methodological issues that have got in the way of straightforwardly using the Manifesto data since our two preceding volumes were published and to resolve them in ways which best serve users and textual analysts in general. The book is thus generally about text-based quantitative analysis with a particular focus on the quality of the CMP-MARPOR data and ways of assessing and using them, In doing so the book goes beyond normal data documentation - essential though that is - to confront the analytic issues faced by users of the data now distributed by MARPOR. It also provides concrete strategies for tackling these at the research level, with examples from the field of political representation. The problems of uncertainty, error, reliability and validity considered here are generic issues for political analysts in any area of research, so the book has an interest extending beyond the Manifesto estimates themselves - in particular to other textual analyses --, Provided by Publisher
Table Of Contents
PART I: VALIDATED, AUTHORITATIVE, INDISPENSIBLE: THE MANIFESTO ESTIMATES IN POLITICAL RESEARCH 1: Ian Budge and Thomas Meyer: The Best Tools to Tackle the Job 2: Robin E. Best: Using The Manifesto Estimates to Correct Systematic 'Centring' Error in Expert and Electoral Positioning of Parties 3: Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Ian Budge: Using The Manifesto Estimates to Refine Party Family Placements PART II: VALIDITY GUARANTEES RELIABILITY: HIGH RELIABILITY LIMITS ERROR 4: Ian Budge, Michael D. McDonald and Thomas Meyer: Validated Estimates versus Dodgy Adjustments: focusing excessively on Error Distorts Results 5: Ian Budge and Thomas Meyer: Understanding and Validating the Right-Left Scale (RILE) 6: Michael D. McDonald: Measuring Uncertainty and Error Directly From the End-Estimates PART III: DELIVERING QUALITY DATA: COLLECTION, CODING, CONTROLS, COMMUNICATION 7: Ian Budge: Linking Uncertainty Measures to Document Selection and Coding 8: Nicolas Merz and Sven Regel: What are Manifestos for? Selecting and Typing Documents for the Database 9: Onawa P. Lacewell and Annika Werner: Coder Training: Key to Enhancing Coding Reliability and Estimate Validity 10: Sven Regel: Data Entry and Access: Introducing the Manifesto Project Database (MPDb) 11: Simon Franzmann: From Data to Inference and Back Again: Perspectives from Content Analysis PART IV: EXPLOITING THE MULTI-LEVEL ESTIMATES TO STUDY REPRESENTATION COMPARATIVELY 12: Ian Budge and Hans-Dieter Klingemann: Parties and Citizens: Representation over 28 Countries 13: Pola Lehmann and Henrike Schultze: Linking Data-Sets from Party to Individual Levels in order to Evaluate Congruence Measures Comparatively 14: Andrea Volkens and Judith Bara: Presidential versus Parliamentary Representation: Extending Manifesto Estimates to Latin America
Mapped to