European University Institute Library

The particularistic president, executive branch politics and political inequality, Douglas L. Kriner, Boston University, Andrew Reeves, Washington University in St. Louis

Content
1
Label
The particularistic president, executive branch politics and political inequality, Douglas L. Kriner, Boston University, Andrew Reeves, Washington University in St. Louis
Language
eng
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Illustrations
mapsillustrations
Index
index present
Literary form
non fiction
Main title
The particularistic president
Nature of contents
bibliography
Oclc number
907119539
Responsibility statement
Douglas L. Kriner, Boston University, Andrew Reeves, Washington University in St. Louis
Sub title
executive branch politics and political inequality
Summary
"As the holders of the only office elected by the entire nation, presidents have long claimed to be sole stewards of the interests of all Americans. Scholars have largely agreed, positing the president as an important counterbalance to the parochial impulses of members of Congress. This supposed fact is often invoked in arguments for concentrating greater power in the executive branch. Douglas L. Kriner and Andrew Reeves challenge this notion and, through an examination of a diverse range of policies from disaster declarations, to base closings, to the allocation of federal spending, show that presidents, like members of Congress, are particularistic. Presidents routinely pursue policies that allocate federal resources in a way that disproportionately benefits their more narrow partisan and electoral constituencies. Though presidents publicly don the mantle of a national representative, in reality they are particularistic politicians who prioritize the needs of certain constituents over others"--, Provided by Publisher
Table of contents
1. Introduction; 2. The origins of presidential particularism; 3. Base closings and trade; 4. Disaster declarations and transportation grants; 5. Federal grants and presidential particularism; 6. The electoral rewards of presidential particularism; 7. Conclusion