Bibliograph

In the court we trust, cooperation, coordination and collaboration between the ECJ and supreme administrative courts, Rob van Gestel, Jurgen de Poorter

Type

Label

In the court we trust, cooperation, coordination and collaboration between the ECJ and supreme administrative courts, Rob van Gestel, Jurgen de Poorter

Language

eng

Index

index present

Literary Form

non fiction

Main title

In the court we trust

Medium

electronic resource

Nature of contents

dictionaries

Oclc number

1130060739

Responsibility statement

Rob van Gestel, Jurgen de Poorter

Series statement

Cambridge studies in european law and policyCambridge books online

Sub title

cooperation, coordination and collaboration between the ECJ and supreme administrative courts

Summary

The preliminary reference procedure has long been envisaged as a judicial dialogue between the European Court of Justice and national courts. However, in reality the relationship appears to be closer to one of growing separation rather than to a happy marriage between equal partners. This book tries to find out: what is behind this? A study of the existing literature, combined with a case law analysis and interviews with judges, has shown that there are a number of important stumble blocks hindering the communication between these courts, such as language barriers, time constraints, and a failing digital infrastructure. However, on a deeper level there also appears to be a lack of mutual trust that prevents Supreme Administrative Courts from using the possibilities the procedure provides, such as the opportunity to offer provisional answers to the Court of Justice and the use of requests for clarification by the latter.--, Provided by publisher

Table Of Contents

Why don't we talk? -- Dialogue as a concept -- Case law analysis

Contributor