Borrow it
Coverart for item
The Resource The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings, by Nicolas A. J. Croquet, (electronic resource)

The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings, by Nicolas A. J. Croquet, (electronic resource)

Creator
Summary
"The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights enjoyed by the accused and other actors affected by international criminal proceedings. Implied external limits in this context are defined as those limits that override the exercise of a human right on public interest grounds or on grounds relating to competing human rights and that either fall outside the scope of a limitation/qualification clause of an international criminal court's internal legal instruments or go beyond its express and ordinary terms. The present monograph will point to various sources of legal uncertainty which international criminal courts have generated in the limitation process of those human rights relevant to international criminal proceedings and to the definition of international crimes. The monograph will examine the relation between human rights, limitations on human rights standards and proportionality under international criminal procedural law and international criminal law (understood substantively) in light of the limitation and proportionality practices of international human rights monitoring bodies."--
Language
eng
Work
Publication
Extent
1 online resource (395 pages)
Contents
  • Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph
  • Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights
  • Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts' Human Rights Limitation Analyses
  • Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right
  • Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel
  • Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures
  • Implied External Limits upon the Accused's Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent
  • Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy
  • Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate
Isbn
9789004231412
Link
https://eui.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004231412
Instance
Label
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings
Title
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings
Statement of responsibility
by Nicolas A. J. Croquet
Creator
Subject
Language
eng
Summary
"The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights enjoyed by the accused and other actors affected by international criminal proceedings. Implied external limits in this context are defined as those limits that override the exercise of a human right on public interest grounds or on grounds relating to competing human rights and that either fall outside the scope of a limitation/qualification clause of an international criminal court's internal legal instruments or go beyond its express and ordinary terms. The present monograph will point to various sources of legal uncertainty which international criminal courts have generated in the limitation process of those human rights relevant to international criminal proceedings and to the definition of international crimes. The monograph will examine the relation between human rights, limitations on human rights standards and proportionality under international criminal procedural law and international criminal law (understood substantively) in light of the limitation and proportionality practices of international human rights monitoring bodies."--
Assigning source
Provided by Publisher
Cataloging source
IDEBK
http://library.link/vocab/creatorDate
1978-
http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
Croquet, Nicolas A. J.
Index
no index present
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
dictionaries
Series statement
Brill E-Books
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
  • International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991
  • International Criminal Court
  • International criminal law
  • Criminal procedure
  • Proportionality in law
  • International law and human rights
  • Fair trial
  • International human rights courts
Label
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings, by Nicolas A. J. Croquet, (electronic resource)
Link
https://eui.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004231412
Instantiates
Publication
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
  • cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier.
Color
multicolored
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent.
Contents
Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph -- Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights -- Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts' Human Rights Limitation Analyses -- Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures -- Implied External Limits upon the Accused's Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent -- Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy -- Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate
Control code
FIEb17828909
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource (395 pages)
Form of item
online
Isbn
9789004231412
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia.
Media type code
  • c
Other control number
10.1163/9789004231412
Specific material designation
remote
Stock number
879113
System control number
(OCoLC)932593795
Label
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings, by Nicolas A. J. Croquet, (electronic resource)
Link
https://eui.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004231412
Publication
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
  • cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier.
Color
multicolored
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent.
Contents
Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph -- Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights -- Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts' Human Rights Limitation Analyses -- Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures -- Implied External Limits upon the Accused's Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent -- Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy -- Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate
Control code
FIEb17828909
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource (395 pages)
Form of item
online
Isbn
9789004231412
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia.
Media type code
  • c
Other control number
10.1163/9789004231412
Specific material designation
remote
Stock number
879113
System control number
(OCoLC)932593795

Subject

Library Locations

    • Badia FiesolanaBorrow it
      Via dei Roccettini 9, San Domenico di Fiesole, 50014, IT
      43.803074 11.283055

Library Links

Structured data from the Bibframe namespace is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License by European University Institute Library. Additional terms may apply to data associated with third party namespaces.