European University Institute Library

Dred Scott and the problem of constitutional evil, Mark A. Graber

Label
Dred Scott and the problem of constitutional evil, Mark A. Graber
Language
eng
Index
index present
Literary Form
non fiction
Main title
Dred Scott and the problem of constitutional evil
Medium
electronic resource
Nature of contents
dictionaries
Oclc number
162542063
Responsibility statement
Mark A. Graber
Series statement
Cambridge studies on the American ConstitutionCambridge Social Sciences eBooks
Summary
Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil , first published in 2006, concerns what is entailed by pledging allegiance to a constitutional text and tradition saturated with concessions to evil. The Constitution of the United States was originally understood as an effort to mediate controversies between persons who disputed fundamental values, and did not offer a vision of the good society. In order to form a 'more perfect union' with slaveholders, late-eighteenth-century citizens fashioned a constitution that plainly compelled some injustices and was silent or ambiguous on other questions of fundamental right. This constitutional relationship could survive only as long as a bisectional consensus was required to resolve all constitutional questions not settled in 1787. Dred Scott challenges persons committed to human freedom to determine whether antislavery northerners should have provided more accommodations for slavery than were constitutionally strictly necessary or risked the enormous destruction of life and property that preceded Lincoln's new birth of freedom.--, Provided by publisher
Table Of Contents
The lessons of Dred Scott -- The constitutional politics of slavery -- Compromising with evil
resource.variantTitle
Dred Scott & the Problem of Constitutional Evil
Content
Mapped to