European University Institute Library

Historical role analysis in the study of religious change, mass educational development in Norway, 1740-1891, John T. Flint

Label
Historical role analysis in the study of religious change, mass educational development in Norway, 1740-1891, John T. Flint
Language
eng
Index
index present
Literary Form
non fiction
Main title
Historical role analysis in the study of religious change
Medium
electronic resource
Nature of contents
dictionaries
Oclc number
726824155
Responsibility statement
John T. Flint
Series statement
The Arnold and Caroline Rose monograph series of the American Sociological AssociationCambridge Social Sciences eBooks
Sub title
mass educational development in Norway, 1740-1891
Summary
This 1990 study in historical sociology explores the relationship between educational development and religious change in Norwegian society during a period of significant social and economic transition. John Flint traces the processes whereby the laity radically reduced clerical control over religious institutions. He examines census materials, reports to the Ministries of the Church and Education, and information from organizational histories, using historical role analysis to describe the changing relationships among state church pastors, parish school teachers, pupils, parents, and lay preachers. In his examination of the movement toward mass literacy, John Flint draws on and contributes to the sociology of comparative education development. His findings from this Norwegian study have wider theoretical and methodological implications, and will be of interest to historians and sociologists studying religion and education.--, Provided by publisher
Table Of Contents
Introduction -- Clerical generations, educational role systems, and lay religiosity, 1740-1840 -- Organizational indicators of religious differentiation in Norwegian society, 1850-1891 -- Elite literacy and styles of religious expression -- Mass educational experience and styles of religious expression -- Religious diversity and the ambiguity of secularity
Content
Mapped to