European University Institute Library

We need to talk, how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization, Matthew S. Levendusky, Dominik A. Stecula

Label
We need to talk, how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization, Matthew S. Levendusky, Dominik A. Stecula
Language
eng
Index
index present
Literary Form
non fiction
Main title
We need to talk
Medium
electronic resource
Nature of contents
dictionaries
Oclc number
1285304074
Responsibility statement
Matthew S. Levendusky, Dominik A. Stecula
Series statement
Cambridge elements. Elements in experimental political science, 2633-3368Cambridge Social Sciences eBooks
Sub title
how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization
Summary
Americans today are affectively polarized: they dislike and distrust those from the opposing political party more than they did in the past, with damaging consequences for their democracy. This Element tests one strategy for ameliorating such animus: having ordinary Democrats and Republicans come together for cross-party political discussions. Building on intergroup contact theory, the authors argue that such discussions will mitigate partisan animosity. Using an original experiment, they find strong support for this hypothesis - affective polarization falls substantially among subjects who participate in heterogeneous discussion (relative to those who participate in either homogeneous political discussion or an apolitical control). This Element also provides evidence for several of the mechanisms underlying these effects, and shows that they persist for at least one week after the initial experiment. These findings have considerable importance for efforts to ameliorate animus in the mass public, and for understanding American politics more broadly.--, Provided by publisher
Content
Mapped to