Bibliograph

Proportionality, reasonableness and standards of review in international investment law and arbitration, Valentina Vadi

Type

Label

Proportionality, reasonableness and standards of review in international investment law and arbitration, Valentina Vadi

Language

eng

Bibliography note

Includes bibliographical references (pages 276-306) and index

Index

index present

Literary Form

non fiction

Main title

Proportionality, reasonableness and standards of review in international investment law and arbitration

Nature of contents

bibliography

Oclc number

1007033877

Responsibility statement

Valentina Vadi

Series statement

Elgar international investment law

Summary

International investment law is one of the most dynamic fields of international law, and yet it has been criticised for failing to strike a fair balance between private and public interests. In this valuable contribution to the current debate, Valentina Vadi examines the merits and pitfalls of arbitral tribunals' use of the concepts of proportionality and reasonableness to review the compatibility of a state's regulatory actions with its obligations under international investment law. Investment law scholars have hitherto given greater attention to the concept of proportionality than to reasonableness; this pivotal book combats this trajectory by examining both concepts in such a way that it does not advocate one over the other, but instead enables the reader to make informed choices. The author also explores the intensity of review as one of the main tools to calibrate the different interests underlying investor-state arbitrations. This timely book offers a useful conceptual framework for reconciling the opposing interests at stake, making it a valuable resource for international law scholars and practitioners and other interested readers. International investment law is one of the most dynamic fields of international law, and yet it has been criticised for failing to strike a fair balance between private and public interests. In this valuable contribution to the current debate, Valentina Vadi examines the merits and pitfalls of arbitral tribunals' use of the concepts of proportionality and reasonableness to review the compatibility of a state's regulatory actions with its obligations under international investment law. Investment law scholars have hitherto given greater attention to the concept of proportionality than to reasonableness; this pivotal book combats this trajectory by examining both concepts in such a way that it does not advocate one over the other, but instead enables the reader to make informed choices. The author also explores the intensity of review as one of the main tools to calibrate the different interests underlying investor-state arbitrations. This timely book offers a useful conceptual framework for reconciling the opposing interests at stake, making it a valuable resource for international law scholars and practitioners and other interested readers.--, Provided by publisher

Table Of Contents

Preface -- Introduction -- 1. International investment law as a field of international law -- 2. The migration of constitutional ideas to international investment law and arbitration law -- 3. A history of success : proportionality in international investment law and arbitration -- 4. Reasonableness in investment treaty arbitration -- 5. Standards of review in investment treaty arbitration -- 6. Proportionality, reasonableness, and standards of review in investment treaty arbitration -- Conclusions -- Index

Creator